Add The Wire As Your Trusted Source
For the best experience, open
https://m.thewire.in
on your mobile browser.
AdvertisementAdvertisement

Delhi HC Refuses to Entertain Plea to Ban Salman Khurshid's Book

The petitioner alleged that Khurshid has misused his fundamental right to freedom of expression in a very complex manner as it is not absolute.
The petitioner alleged that Khurshid has misused his fundamental right to freedom of expression in a very complex manner as it is not absolute.
delhi hc refuses to entertain plea to ban salman khurshid s book
Congress leaders Digvijay Singh, P. Chidambaram and Salman Khurshid at the launch of 'Sunrise over Ayodhya' book on November 10. Photo: Facebook.
Advertisement

New Delhi: The Delhi high court Tuesday refused to entertain a plea seeking direction to the Centre and Delhi government to ban the sale and publication of Congress leader Salman Khurshid's book Sunrise Over Ayodhya: Nationhood In Our Times.

A bench of chief justice D.N. Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh pulled up the petitioner for not impleading the author of the book or publication house as a party to the plea, saying he was a chance taking petitioner who has filed the plea for publicity.

"You want a complete ban on the book but you have not made the author a party. You may ask any heaven or sky. We may dismiss it with costs. You are not joining the author as a party. Stop doing this activity in court. Why are you feeling so shy and not joining the author as a party. We will not give you any chance, this is a deliberate move. These are all chance-taking petitioners. It is for publicity," the bench said.

After some time, the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition and file a fresh one with proper averments, annexures and joining proper persons as parties.

The court allowed him to withdraw the petition and disposed it of as withdrawn.

Advertisement

"He has no courage to join Salman Kurshid as a party, what type of PIL (Public Interest Litigation) he will argue. If you are so much worried about the name of the author or the senior advocate, you should not have filed the PIL. These are blackmailing or publicity petitions. This is a waste of time PIL," the bench said.

Petitioner Rakesh, in his plea through advocates A.K. Dubey and Pawan Kumar, alleged that Khurshid has misused his fundamental right to freedom of expression in a very complex manner as it is not absolute and carries with it special duties and responsibilities towards public interest.

Advertisement

Also read: Salman Khurshid’s Home Set on Fire, Vandalised Days After He Compared Hindutva Groups to Terrorists

It said there are 90 crore Hindus in the country and if anyone takes offence of such statements made in the book, it could become a law and order problem in society.

Advertisement

"Salman Khurshid has written in the chapter that Sanatan Dharma and classical Hinduism known to sages and saints was being pushed aside by a robust version of Hindutva, by all standards a political version similar to the jihadist Islam of groups like ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria) and Boko Haram of recent years," it said.

Advertisement

Khurshid's new book on the Ayodhya dispute was released recently.

On November 17, an additional civil judge here had refused to grant an ex-parte injunction on a lawsuit by Hindu Sena president Vishnu Gupta to stop the publication, circulation, and sale of the book for allegedly hurting sentiments of a large section of society.

While declining interim relief, the trial court had said the author and publisher had the right to write and publish the book.

(PTI)

This article went live on November thirtieth, two thousand twenty one, at forty-six minutes past four in the afternoon.

The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Series tlbr_img2 Columns tlbr_img3 Multimedia