New Delhi: A court on Tuesday rejected a request from Anheuser-Busch InBev to stay a three-year sales ban imposed by New Delhi city authorities, dealing yet another setback for the world's largest brewer in of the country's key markets.

Owing to allegations of evading local state taxes, the authorities in New Delhi had barred AB InBev in July from selling its beer. The company had denied the allegations. The state's excise commissioner, who is already hearing an appeal against the ban order, had rejected a request from the company to hold off implementing the ban, Reuters reported last month. The company's plea against the city government was heard at a Delhi high court on Tuesday, where Justice Navin Chawla declined to give any immediate relief and said the appeals process before the state authorities must first be completed. Chawla had questioned the need for two parallel proceedings.

Also read: Delhi Govt Bans Beer Manufacturer AB InBev for 3 Years for Alleged Tax Evasion

The city government's ban order followed a three-year investigation which found that the beer maker SABMiller – acquired by AB InBev in 2016 for around $100 billion – used duplicate bar codes on its beer bottles supplied to city retailers that year, allowing it to pay lower levies.

AB InBev, which accounts for popular beer brands such as Budweiser, Hoegaarden and Stella Artois in its portfolio, said on Tuesday it was contesting the allegations which were dated back to 2016, before its takeover of SABMiller.

"It is our understanding that appropriate excise duty payments were made. We are committed to operating with integrity and high ethical standards," the company said in a statement to Reuters.

On Tuesday, the Delhi government's counsel referred to the case as one involving "clandestine" dealings, arguing that the brewer had not completed its appeals proceedings with the state which will next be heard on September 9.

Rajiv Nayar, AB InBev's counsel, however, argued for immediate relief, saying the brewer was suffering due to the ban as it could not apply for state licences for the next year. Though Justice Chawla did not agree to give any relief for now, he said he viewed the case as one in which the city government acted beyond its authority in banning AB InBev. He will next hear the case on Sept 16.

Among those sitting in a packed New Delhi courtroom was John K. Johnson, AB InBev's vice president for legal & corporate affairs for South Asia, who took notes and flipped through legal documents during the hearing.

AB InBev is the second biggest player in India’s $7 billion beer market, accounting for a 17.5% market share, according to the research firm IWSR Drinks Market Analysis. Industry executives have said the Delhi ban would be a major setback for AB InBev, which is also battling a separate Indian antitrust probe concerning alleged beer price fixing by SABMiller and other companies.

(Reuters)

The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.