Add The Wire As Your Trusted Source
For the best experience, open
https://m.thewire.in
on your mobile browser.
AdvertisementAdvertisement

‘Puncture Repairers’; ‘From Jafrabad, Saharanpur’: Ramesh Bidhuri’s Communal Dog Whistles Against Jantar Mantar Protesters

Addressing BJP's 'Gen-Z Summit' in Delhi, the former BJP MP says more 'puncture-repairers' than students were present at Jantar Mantar; claims people were brought in with skullcaps removed
Addressing BJP's 'Gen-Z Summit' in Delhi, the former BJP MP says more 'puncture-repairers' than students were present at Jantar Mantar; claims people were brought in with skullcaps removed
‘puncture repairers’  ‘from jafrabad  saharanpur’  ramesh bidhuri’s communal dog whistles against jantar mantar protesters
Prime Minister Narendra Modi with Ramesh Bidhuri.
Advertisement

“There were mostly ‘puncture repairers’ and ‘locksmiths’ at the Jantar Mantar protest.”

As the BJP continues to portray the Cockroach Janta Party-led student movement through a communal lens, former BJP MP and RSS member Ramesh Bidhuri described participants of the Jantar Mantar protest as “puncture repairers” and “locksmiths” while addressing the BJP’s ‘Gen-Z Summit’ in Delhi on August 2. In Right-wing rhetoric, “puncture repairer” is often used as a derogatory, communal slur to insinuate Muslims. Reinforcing the dog whistle, Bidhuri told the audience, “You know very well who the puncture repairers are.”

The BJP-organised summit was held at Tughlakabad in South Delhi, with Delhi’s minister for home, power and education, Ashish Sood, attending as the chief guest. Speaking about the student protest at Jantar Mantar over alleged irregularities in the NEET examination and slogans raised against Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Bidhuri claimed that while “20,000 to 50,000” people had been mobilised by “misleading and instigating” them, “those present were mostly unemployed puncture repairers and locksmiths.” He further said, “You know who the puncture repairers are. They were the ones present in large numbers, whereas actual students were few; I want to inform you of this fact.”

Bidhuri’s remarks sought to portray the largely student-led protest as one dominated by Muslims rather than genuine students, echoing a recurring attempt by BJP leaders and supporters to recast the anti-NEET movement in communal terms instead of engaging with its demands over alleged examination irregularities.

Advertisement

Bidhuri went on to make the communal insinuation more explicit. “Could a daughter or son of India speak in such a manner about Modi-ji or his family? It must have been the offspring or kin of those puncture repairers who were using such language regarding Modi-ji,” he said.

His remarks came in the context of a video posted by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Instagram, Facebook and X on July 31. In the video, Modi claimed that during the Jantar Mantar protest, some “mischievous youths” had hurled abuses and profanities at him and his late mother. Calling the language used by some young women at the protest a “cultural shock”, the Prime Minister said such “misguided youths” should be shown the right path and forgiven.

Advertisement

By linking the alleged abuse of the Prime Minister to “puncture repairers”, Bidhuri appeared to suggest that those who raised the slogans belonged to the Muslim community, reinforcing the communal narrative surrounding the student-led protest.

‘Misguided Gen Z at the Jantar Mantar protest’

Speaking to the media, Bidhuri described the students who participated in the Jantar Mantar protest as “misguided Gen-Z.” He claimed they had been misled into joining the demonstration, saying, “These children — aged 15 or 16 –were brought there without being told the facts. While the sit-in was ostensibly about NEET, and photographs of deceased children were displayed to emotionally blackmail parents and others into attending, their actual demands did not include Dharmendra Pradhan’s resignation or any specific measures regarding NEET.”

Advertisement

He further alleged that the protest had the backing of the Opposition and was intended to create unrest. “The Prime Minister accepted their demands to prevent the country from going astray and to ensure the agitation did not fall into the wrong hands. The protest was not held with the intent originally claimed; instead, with the opposition’s support, it was an attempt to create chaos in India,” he said.

Advertisement

‘People brought in wearing kalavas instead of skullcaps’

When questioned by a Times Now journalist on August 2 about his remarks referring to protesters as “puncture repairers”, Bidhuri doubled down on the claim. He alleged that many of those present had been brought from areas such as Seelampur.

“Those people were brought in from areas like Seelampur, Jafrabad and Saharanpur. They were instructed not to wear skullcaps but to wear kalavas instead. Students made up only 15–20% of the crowd — something I had been saying from day one,” Bidhuri said.

He further claimed that the small number of “genuine students” present had themselves objected to the slogans raised at the protest. “They were genuine students, though few in number. They even voiced their opposition. They said on camera, ‘We have come here for NEET; why are Hindus being abused?'” he added.

Use of terms like 'katuwa' and 'mulle' in parliament

This is not the first time Bidhuri has courted controversy over his communal statements. He made headlines in 2023 for making objectionable remarks during a parliamentary debate. Then a BJP MP, Bidhuri used derogatory slurs like “Katuwa” and “Mulle” against Kunwar Danish Ali, an MP from the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), and labelled him an “extremist” and “terrorist.”

Moreover, towards the end of the aforementioned video, Ramesh Bidhuri is seen explicitly threatening Kunwar Danish Ali, saying, “Keep a note of what he is saying; I will deal with this Mulle outside.”

In August 2015, five female Lok Sabha MPs had lodged a complaint with the Speaker against Ramesh Bidhuri for allegedly using derogatory and sexist language.

Again, during the farmers’ protest in December 2020, Bidhuri questioned the number of protesters and called them “brokers” (dalal). He alleged that they were participating in the agitation because they were receiving money from Canada and Pakistan, along with free food and drink.


On January 5, 2024, at the BJP’s ‘Parivartan Rally’ in Rohini, Delhi, Bidhuri had remarked, “Atishi has changed her father; she has gone from being Marlena to Singh.” At the time, Aam Aadmi Party’s Atishi was the chief minister of Delhi.

This article is republished from Alt News. Read the original here

This article went live on August sixth, two thousand twenty six, at twelve minutes past six in the evening.

The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Series tlbr_img2 Columns tlbr_img3 Multimedia