Add The Wire As Your Trusted Source
HomePoliticsEconomyWorldSecurityLawScienceSocietyCultureEditors-PickVideo
Advertisement

Savarkar 'Defamation' Case: Pune Court Says It Can't Compel Rahul Gandhi to Produce Book Cited by Him

Grandnephew of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar sought access to a `book' cited by Gandhi while allegedly making defamatory remarks against Savarkar.
The Wire Staff
Jul 04 2025
  • whatsapp
  • fb
  • twitter
Grandnephew of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar sought access to a `book' cited by Gandhi while allegedly making defamatory remarks against Savarkar.
Lok Sabha leader of opposition Rahul Gandhi. Photo: @INCIndia/YT via PTI
Advertisement

A court in Pune on Thursday (July 3) rejected a petition by the grandnephew of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar wherein he sought access to a `book' cited by Lok Sabha leader of opposition Rahul Gandhi while allegedly making defamatory remarks against Savarkar.

Judge Amol Shinde of the special court for MPs and MLAs said that Gandhi cannot be compelled to produce the book.

"The accused may produce any relevant documents during the presentation of his defense evidence. If the accused is compelled to produce such evidence prematurely, it would amount to violation of his fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India, which protects against self-incrimination," said the court order, reported Press Trust of India.

Advertisement

Earlier, the application was filed by Satyaki Savarkar who claimed that no such book as cited by Gandhi existed, and he should be asked to produce it if it did.

“As per Article 20(3)...'No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself. Therefore, this Court is of the opinion that an order cannot be passed directing the accused to file the incriminating documents," said the court.

Advertisement

According to the complaint filed by Satyaki Savarkar, Gandhi had claimed during the speech in London in March 2023 that V.D. Savarkar had written in a "book" that "he and five to six of his friends once beat up a Muslim man, and he (Savarkar) felt happy".

The complainant claimed in the defamation case that no such incident took place and neither did Savarkar write about it.

This article went live on July fourth, two thousand twenty five, at thirteen minutes past one in the afternoon.

The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Advertisement
Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
Advertisement
View in Desktop Mode