Add The Wire As Your Trusted Source
For the best experience, open
https://m.thewire.in
on your mobile browser.
AdvertisementAdvertisement

India’s Stellar 8.2% Growth? Dissecting the Data-Reality Divide

The divergence between data and economic ground realities has cast doubt on the reliability of India's GDP data.
The divergence between data and economic ground realities has cast doubt on the reliability of India's GDP data.
india’s stellar 8 2  growth  dissecting the data reality divide
Representative Image. Credit: Unsplash
Advertisement

India's 2QFY26 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth at 8.2% confounds fears of an economic slowdown, signaling a blazing economy immured to global headwinds such as US tariffs. This surge, driven by strong private consumption and manufacturing, alongside robust financial services, marks one of the highest growth rates in six quarters and positions India as the fastest-growing major economy globally. Yet beneath this headline triumph lies a paradox of economic dynamics that raises questions on the underlying robustness and sustainability of growth in India.

Robust GDP growth amid policy stimulus

The 8.2% real GDP growth in Q2FY26 was buoyed by a vigorous 8% rise in private consumption despite a contraction in government spending by 2.7%. Manufacturing led the supply-side growth with a 9.1% surge, supported by a 9.2% rise in services, notably a 10.2% increase in financial and real estate services. Gross fixed capital formation grew at a moderate 7.3%, while agriculture and construction slowed. This period also witnessed the government pursuing reflationary measures such as Goods and Services Tax (GST) rate cuts under "Bachat Utsav," pre-election cash transfers, income tax relaxations, and employment incentives. The Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) monetary easing, with rate cuts and reduced cash reserve ratio, further exemplifies policy accommodation aimed at sustaining growth momentum.

Paradox of growth vs. economic realities

Despite the headline GDP showing an average 8% growth over the first two quarters, several indicators reveal a disconnect from economic realities. Money supply growth stands at 9.5%, lower than the expected 11-12% for an economy growing at this pace, signaling sluggish household income growth and deposit expansion. Retail credit demand, excluding gold and mortgage loans, has shrunk considerably, while incremental bank credit to industry and personal loans have also dropped sharply. These trends imply caution among households and firms, highlighting fiscal pressure and leveraged balance sheets.

Industrial performance and consumer demand contradict the standout GDP numbers. Consumer goods production growth was tepid at 1.3% during the quarter, and the Index of Industrial Production (IIP) growth averaged just 3.2% in the first half, contrasting with the strong 8.4% manufacturing Gross Value Added (GVA) growth. Power consumption, which typically mirrors industrial and economic expansion, grew by only 1%, and petrol consumption rose modestly at 2.3%. Furthermore, corporate sales growth averaged a modest 5%, below nominal GDP growth, and operating profits reflect subdued earnings, consistent with weak private investment and demand.

Discrepancy between headline and core GDP

A key element of this paradox is the widening gap between headline GDP growth and core GDP growth, which strips out residual statistical discrepancies. Core GDP has slowed to a nine-quarter low of 4.1% in 2Q FY26, suggesting that unexplained residual factors inflate headline growth figures. This misalignment casts doubt on the true pace of private consumption and capital expenditure, with private investment appearing stagnant or even declining in real terms. The fiscal stimulus, therefore, may be masking deeper structural weaknesses rather than reflecting solid underlying demand.

Advertisement

Credibility concerns and policy implications

The divergence between data and economic ground realities has cast doubt on the reliability of India's GDP data, prompting the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to downgrade India's national income data quality to a "Grade C," citing methodological issues and large measurement discrepancies. Policymakers, businesses, and households are confronted with confusing signals as GDP growth remains strong while corporate earnings, credit demand, and tax collections falter. This disparity complicates strategy formulation and decision-making, with foreign investors expressing disenchantment due to weak earnings growth despite robust GDP headlines. Structural impediments, including global trade fragmentation and subdued private investment, are likely to persist, challenging the sustainability of the growth narrative.

This complex interplay of seemingly contradictory data points epitomises the paradox of India's "blazing" economy, robust growth on paper coexisting with muted economic fundamentals in reality. Policymakers may need to focus on improving data transparency, revisiting growth measurement methodologies, and addressing structural constraints to reconcile the gap between GDP figures and lived economic experiences in India.

Advertisement

Dhananjay Sinha is a CEO and co-head of institutional equities at Systematix Group.

Advertisement
This article went live on December second, two thousand twenty five, at twenty minutes past five in the evening.

The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Series tlbr_img2 Columns tlbr_img3 Multimedia