The Most Dangerous Consequence of Paper Leaks Is Students Losing Faith in Education
The most dangerous thing about injustice is not merely that it exists but that society slowly begins to accept it as normal. That is precisely what is happening to India's examination system.
Nearly 22 lakh students walked into examination halls believi
Then came allegations that the NEET-UG 2026 paper had been compromised and was circulating in the form of a guess paper. Soon after the examination was cancelled, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) was asked to step in to probe what happened, and a re-examination was scheduled for June 21. The lives of the 22 lakh aspirants were thrown back into uncertainty and emotional exhaustion.
The CBI informed a Delhi court that the leaked NEET paper had allegedly originated from a person connected to the National Testing Agency. If these allegations prove true they raise disturbing questions about the integrity of the very institution entrusted with conducting one of the country's most important examinations.
What makes this even more devastating is that none of this feels new anymore. India has seen similar controversies before, from Vyapam that surfaced in 2013 to the All India Pre-medical Entrance cancelled in 2015; from the Staff Selection Commission or SSC paper leak controversies to UGC-NET cancellations; from the prior instances of NEET paper leaks to yet another one in 2026. News reports and statements of opposition leaders highlight nearly 89 examination papers have been leaked across India over the last decade, leading to 48 re-examinations and affecting crores of aspirants.
The human cost
Nothing captures the human cost of this collapse more painfully than the death of 22-year-old NEET aspirant Pradeep Mahich in Rajasthan’s Sikar, allegedly by suicide amid the stress and uncertainty of having to appear for the test again. And yet, around the same time, a Rajasthan minister publicly remarked that paper leaks were “not a big deal”.
For those in positions of power and privilege, a paper leak and re-test may be just another controversy. For students it can mean the collapse of years of hope.
In most functioning systems, students prepare for examinations, trust the process and appear for them. But in India, administrative failures have become disturbingly common. Urdu-medium students in Latur were reportedly handed the wrong English question paper during an SSC examination In NEET-UG 2025, students raised concerns regarding faul
Indian students spend their most productive years preparing for exams, battling anxiety and depression – and then they are made to fight the system itself. The burden of repeated institutional failures falls on them, in the form of hyper-vigilance directed at them. They face humiliating frisking and surveillance at examination centres – while being allotted centres hundreds of kilometres away from home.(Congress MP Shashi Tharoor and others have urged the government to examine the arbitrary manner in which centres were being allocated.)
Warnings ignored
The irony is that students are treated like suspects while the system repeatedly fails to stop organised paper leaks. Many of these failures were not unforeseeable. Expert committees and parliamentary panels repeatedly warned both the Education Ministry and the NTA about vulnerabilities within the examination system but the government sat on them.
In October 2024, following that year's NEET controversy, a committee headed by former ISRO chairman Dr K. Radhakrishnan recom
In December 2025, a Parliamentary Standing Committee also raised concerns about the examination crisis, and questioned what substantive reforms had actually been implemented and why blacklisted companies continued receiving contracts through alternate routes while failures associated with NTA-administered examinations kept mounting. Reports say, the government recently rejected those recommendations.
The question remains: if expert bodies warned the ministry not once but twice, in writing, and meaningful action still did not follow, then who is responsible for failing India’s students? For millions of middle class and rural families, competitive examinations are the only route through which hard work and talent can overcome inequality.
Shouldn't those entrusted with conducting one of the country's largest examinations face institutional accountability when an exam has been compromised repeatedly within just three years?
The CBI has reportedly arrested dozens of individuals in connection with the NEET paper leak investigation, but institutional accountability at the highest levels remains largely absent.
Companies behind the crisis
The examination crisis is not merely about individual leaks. It is also about the ecosystem through which these examinations are conducted. Over the years, contracts for conducting major examinations have repeatedly been awarded to companies that themselves faced allegations, suspensions or blacklisting.
For instance, Eduquity reportedly received contracts to conduct SSC examinations despite allegations of previous irregularities. Aptech faced suspension in Jammu and Kashmir and scrutiny from the Gauhati High Court over examination-related concerns but r
Multiple paper leak probes were announced in quick succession in Jammu and Kashmir, including one for the sub-inspector recruitment examination for J&K Police. Students themselves took to the streets to expose the irregularities. Despite these failures, very little appear to have fundamentally changed.
Even the examination patterns have become unpredictable. Observers have been noting that ever since the formation of the NTA, examinations have often lacked a balanced pattern. They are sometimes excessively easy, sometimes disproportionately difficult. This too raises concerns about institutional competence. An organisation responsible for determining the future of millions cannot function through repeated breaches of trust and inconsistent patterns.
Another dangerous culture has simultaneously emerged: the idea that questioning institutions or demanding accountability is "anti-national". Criticism is treated not as democratic scrutiny but disloyalty. The result is institutional impunity. Vedant Shrivastava who exposed a major technical glitch in the Central Board of School Certification's new digital evaluation system was branded as anti-national on social media by a prominent anchor of a governmnet-owned TV channel, before the board finally admitted the answer sheet mix-up.
Will CBT solve every problem in higher education?
The Federation of All India Medical Association (FAIMA) recently argued that NTA is structurally incapacitated and warned that merely shifting NEET towards Computer-Based Testing (CBT) would not automatically restore credibility or integrity. The association pointed out that even CBT examinations have witnessed paper leaks and irregularities in the past, and the alleged involvement of private institutes and consulting networks in this. The deeper problem would still require structural reform to the education and testing system.
For starters, the digital divide cannot be ignored when testing is conducted. Rural districts still struggle with unstable internet connectivity, electricity disruptions and inadequate testing infrastructure. A poorly implemented CBT system can replace one form of injustice with another.
Tragedy of institutional failure
The real tragedy of the examination crisis is that students end up paying the price of every failure of the system. Yet millions continue appearing for these examinations because they have no alternative. Examinations NEET still represent one of the few paths through which hard work and talent can transform lives. But are these examinations truly testing your understanding or social advantage?
Around these examinations, an enormous coaching economy has emerged, factories built on the aspirations of young Indians. Students are pushed into cycles of isolation, pressure, rankings and emotional exhaustion in pursuit of a future that the system itself repeatedly fails to protect.
We often describe our youth as the country's greatest strength. But a nation cannot repeatedly celebrate its young people in speeches while casually exhausting them through broken institutions. Paper leaks can no longer be treated as irregularities. They represent a deeper national crisis that intersects with the growing fear that quality education itself is steadily slipping beyond the grasp of most families.
For decades, education functioned as the great social leveller, a route through which caste, poverty and inherited disadvantage could be challenged. Public universities like IITs, IIMs and government medical colleges were never merely institutions, but formed the architecture of social mobility. But when examinations repeatedly lose credibility and access to quality education appears linked to economic capacity rather than merit, it weakens faith in the promise that education can transform lives.
Kanwal Singh is a policy analyst.
The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
