Add The Wire As Your Trusted Source
HomePoliticsEconomyWorldSecurityLawScienceSocietyCultureEditors-PickVideo
Advertisement

'Last Warning': SC Takes Dim View of Centre's Response to Community Kitchen Scheme

'This affidavit does not indicate anywhere that you are considering framing a scheme.'
The Wire Staff
Nov 17 2021
  • whatsapp
  • fb
  • twitter
'This affidavit does not indicate anywhere that you are considering framing a scheme.'
A man walks inside the premises of the Supreme Court of India. Photo: Reuters/Adnan Abidi
Advertisement

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has expressed strong displeasure over the Union government's response on framing a pan-India policy to implement the Community Kitchen Scheme and granted it three weeks to hold a meeting with states, saying that a welfare state's first responsibility is to "provide food to people dying due to hunger".

A bench comprising Chief Justice N.V. Ramana and Justices A.S. Bopanna and Hima Kohli, hearing a PIL seeking directions to the Centre, states and Union Territories (UTs) to formulate a scheme for community kitchens to combat hunger and malnutrition, was irked with the Union government's affidavit as it was filed by an official of the level of an Under Secretary and did not divulge details about the proposed scheme and its roll out as sought.

"This affidavit does not indicate anywhere that you are considering framing a scheme. You are extracting information. It does not say what fund you have collected and what you are doing etc. We wanted a uniform model from the Centre. You have to ask the states... Not to collect information like police, the bench said at the outset," the apex court said.

Advertisement

"You cannot ask for information which is already available. Do you conclude your affidavit saying you will consider the scheme now. There is not a whisper in your 17-page affidavit," it said.

The top court then expressed anguish over the filing of the affidavit by an Under Secretary of the Union Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Administration.

Advertisement

"This is the last warning I am going to give to the Government of India. Your Under Secretary files this affidavit. Why can not a secretary level officer file the affidavit? You have to respect the institutions. We say something and you write something. This has been told several times earlier," the bench said.

Also read: India Has a Serious Hunger Problem and it Needs Urgent Policy Intervention

Initially, the matter was being argued by Additional Solicitor General Madhvi Divan and later Attorney General K.K. Venugopal stepped in and assured the bench that a meeting would be held by the Union government and a decision taken on the issue and sought four weeks time from the bench.

The top law officer said that something can be worked out within the framework of the National Food Security Act.

"The question is simple, last occasion we made it clear unless and until states are involved the Centre can not do anything. So we directed the Centre to call the meeting and frame the policy. The issue is now, make a comprehensive scheme, identify areas where there's immediate need, so it can be uniformly implemented," the CJI said.

"See if you want to take care of hunger, no constitution or law will say no... This is the first principle: Every welfare state's first responsibility is to provide food to people dying due to hunger," the bench said.

In its order, the bench also recorded that it was not happy with the Centre's affidavit filed by the Under Secretary.

"We direct that here afterwards some responsible secretary has to file the affidavit. Still it appears from the affidavit and the submissions by the Centre that they are still obtaining suggestions and views. In view of that, we finally grant three weeks time to come up with some scheme which can be agreeable by states also," the bench said.

"Otherwise if states have any objection we will consider it on next date of hearing. We direct all states to attend a meeting called by the Government of India in coming up with a scheme," the apex court ordered.

Bar and Bench has reported that the court sought to impress upon the AG that is it not dealing with the global hunger index or the specific issue of malnutrition.

"You present the status before us and we will pass a judicial order. Another thing we want to clarify is don't think the scheme is related to international index of malnutrition etc. We are not concerned with malnutrition etc, but we are on hunger," the apex court said.

India has slipped to 101st position in the Global Hunger Index (GHI) 2021 of 116 countries, from its 2020 position of 94th and is behind its neighbours Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Earlier hearings

Earlier, the bench had asked the Centre to come out with some policy decisions concerning the implementation of the Community Kitchen Scheme by taking into consideration similar schemes which are operational in different states.

The apex court had also taken note of incidents of alleged hunger deaths and malnutrition of children in some states and asked them to file short replies by identifying the districts, talukas and villages where such incidents have taken place or taking place.

The apex court, on February 17 last year, had imposed an additional cost of Rs 5 lakh each on Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Manipur, Odisha, Goa, and Delhi for not complying with its directions to file their affidavits on the PIL, which sought formulation of the scheme to set up community kitchens for the poor.

Advocate Ashima Mandla, appearing for the PIL petitioners, was asked by the bench to prepare a chart of all the states who have filed their replies to the PIL. She had said 69% of children under the age of five have lost their lives due to malnutrition and it is high time that states take steps to set up community kitchens.

The apex court had on October 18, 2019, favoured setting up of community kitchens, saying the country needs this kind of a system to tackle the problem of hunger.

The plea claimed that many children under the age of five die every day due to hunger and malnutrition and this condition was violative of various fundamental rights, including the right to food and the life of citizens.

The PIL, filed by social activists Anun Dhawan, Ishann Dhawan, and Kunjana Singh, had also sought a direction to the Centre for creating a national food grid for people falling outside the purview of the public distribution scheme.

The plea referred to the state-funded community kitchens being run in Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Odisha, Jharkhand and Delhi that serve meals at subsidised rates in hygienic conditions.

(With PTI inputs)

This article went live on November seventeenth, two thousand twenty one, at thirty minutes past eleven in the morning.

The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Advertisement
Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
Advertisement
View in Desktop Mode