Add The Wire As Your Trusted Source
HomePoliticsEconomyWorldSecurityLawScienceSocietyCultureEditors-PickVideo
Advertisement

The Wire Talks | Adding Secular and Socialist to the Constitution in the Beginning Would Have Been Superfluous

'It was obvious from the document that it would be a welfare state and a secular state,' Raju Ramachandran says.
Sidharth Bhatia
Jan 24 2025
  • whatsapp
  • fb
  • twitter
'It was obvious from the document that it would be a welfare state and a secular state,' Raju Ramachandran says.
Sidharth Bhatia and Raju Ramachandran.
Advertisement

The Indian constitution came into effect on January 26, 1950 and Republic Day is a commemoration of that. The framers of the constitution gave the nation a document that had the vision to guide matters of the Indian state.

Many questions have been raised about the constitution – some members of the BJP want to remove the words "secular" and "socialist" because they were not in the original document.

“It would have superfluous to add the words then,” says veteran constitutional lawyer Raju Ramchandran in this podcast discussion with Sidharth Bhatia. “It was obvious from the document that it would be a welfare state and a secular state” he says.

Advertisement

Ramachandran says the One Nation One Election idea “militates against federalism” because it “subordinates the rights against the states”. He rejects the idea that it would save money – “in fact it will be more expensive, with the cost of additional manpower, EVMs etc.”

Advertisement

This article went live on January twenty-fourth, two thousand twenty five, at twenty-five minutes past three in the afternoon.

The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Advertisement
Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
Advertisement
View in Desktop Mode