Add The Wire As Your Trusted Source
HomePoliticsEconomyWorldSecurityLawScienceSocietyCultureEditors-PickVideo
Advertisement

SC Reserves Judgment on Demonetisation, Asks Union Govt, RBI for Records

The AG submitted before the bench that he will submit relevant records in a sealed cover.
The Wire Staff
Dec 07 2022
  • whatsapp
  • fb
  • twitter
The AG submitted before the bench that he will submit relevant records in a sealed cover.
FILE IMAGE: People standing in long queues to exchange their old Rs 500 and 1000 notes and withdraw cash from the ATM in New Delhi, November 2016. Photo: PTI/Subhav Shukla/Files
Advertisement

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday, December 7, directed the Union government and the central bank, Reserve Bank of India, to put on record relevant records relating to the government's 2016 decision to demonetise currency notes of Rs 1000 and Rs 500 denomination.

Reserving its verdict on a batch of pleas challenging the Union government's 2016 decision, a five-judge constitution bench headed by Justice S.A. Nazeer heard the submissions from Attorney General for India R. Venkataramani, RBI's counsel Jaideep Gupta and the petitioners lawyers including senior advocates P. Chidambaram and Shyam Divan.

"Heard. judgement reserved. Learned counsels of the Union of India and Reserve Bank of India are directed to produce the relevant records," the bench also comprising Justices B.R. Gavai, A.S. Bopanna, V. Ramasubramanian, and B.V. Nagarathna, said.

Advertisement

The AG submitted before the bench that he will submit relevant records in a sealed cover. The bench has set a deadline of December 10, according to LiveLaw.

The top court was hearing a batch of 58 petitions challenging the demonetisation exercise announced by the Union government on November 8, 2016.

Advertisement

In an earlier hearing the Supreme Court said that just because the move by the Union government was an economic decision, it is not going to “fold its hands and sit” and will examine the manner in which the decision was taken.

For RBI, senior advocate Gupta had said that “temporary hardships” are an “integral part of the nation-building process.”

For one of the petitioners, senior advocate Chidambaram told the court that the decision was a “deeply flawed” one.

Experts have called the Union government’s justification for it in the affidavit it submitted to the apex court inadequate and unsupported by concrete data.

(With PTI inputs)

This article went live on December seventh, two thousand twenty two, at twenty-seven minutes past two in the afternoon.

The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Advertisement
Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
Advertisement
View in Desktop Mode