Add The Wire As Your Trusted Source
HomePoliticsEconomyWorldSecurityLawScienceSocietyCultureEditors-PickVideo
Advertisement

Watch | ECI Response to Rahul Gandhi 'Inadvisable', Should Order 'Immediate Inquiry': Former CEC

O.P. Rawat pointed out that in citing Rule 20 (3) (b) of the Registration of Electors Rules of 1960 to demand an affidavit on oath from Gandhi, the Election Commission was converting something that was discretionary and optional into a mandatory requirement.
Karan Thapar
Aug 13 2025
  • whatsapp
  • fb
  • twitter
O.P. Rawat pointed out that in citing Rule 20 (3) (b) of the Registration of Electors Rules of 1960 to demand an affidavit on oath from Gandhi, the Election Commission was converting something that was discretionary and optional into a mandatory requirement.
Advertisement

Om Prakash Rawat, who served as the 22nd Chief Election Commissioner of India in 2018, has said that the Election Commission’s response to Rahul Gandhi’s disturbing allegations about fraudulent voters in Mahadevapura is “inadvisable” and “unfortunate”. Instead, he said, the Election Commission should “immediately inquire and investigate” into the allegations levelled by Gandhi.

In a 30-minute interview to Karan Thapar for The Wire, Rawat said the Election Commission has not followed its own conventional practice and has instead opted to “reinvent the wheel”. The established practice of the Commission – which Rawat said was followed in an earlier instance of allegations about the electoral register in Hyderabad when he was Chief Election Commissioner – is to immediately order a full-fledged inquiry and investigation and not require an affidavit on oath.

Equally importantly, Rawat pointed out that in citing Rule 20 (3) (b) of the Registration of Electors Rules of 1960 to demand an affidavit on oath from Gandhi, the Election Commission was converting something that was discretionary and optional into a mandatory requirement. More importantly, Rawat argued this rule does not apply to the Rahul Gandhi case and, when pressed whether it was therefore being wrongly applied, Rawat chose to maintain silence and instead smiled. When it was pointed out to him that the audience would take his silence as an affirmative answer he continued to smile.

Advertisement

Advertisement

This article went live on August thirteenth, two thousand twenty five, at forty-seven minutes past two in the afternoon.

The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Advertisement
Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
Advertisement
View in Desktop Mode