When the First Responder Wears a Police Uniform
In much of India, the first person to reach someone in crisis is neither a doctor nor a counsellor, but a police officer. A stranger on the edge of a bridge railing, a family that does not know where else to turn, a bystander alarmed by someone in visible distress: the instinct, almost everywhere, is to call the police or walk into the nearest thana.
This is built into how the system runs. Distress calls flow through Dial-112 and Dial-100 to police control rooms, which send police patrol vans and officers to the scene. Long before a psychiatrist or a helpline appears, it is a constable who arrives first. And this is a public health emergency, not a law-and-order one considering India records nearly 1.7 lakh suicides a year, a toll counted, tellingly, entirely from police reports.
Consider who these encounters involve. The people the police meet in a crisis are disproportionately the most vulnerable and marginalised, the young, and the isolated, the very people least able to reach conventional support services and most likely to meet the state, at their lowest moment, in uniform.
The Mental Healthcare Act of 2017 recognised as much when it stopped treating a suicide attempt as a crime and giving police officers a duty as state representative to take a person in distress to support services. On paper, the officer's job shifted from booking a case to saving a life and ensuring care continum.
Yet a quiet problem hides in plain sight. We expect officers to calm, reassure, and "counsel" the people they find in crisis, without pausing to ask what counselling, or psychological first aid, actually means. These are not vague acts of kindness but specific, learnable skills: spotting the signs that someone is at risk, listening in a way that lowers the distress rather than raising it, and connecting a person to real help, what the World Health Organisation calls, simply, look, listen, link. Ask an untrained or rather self -trained officer to "counsel" a person on a ledge and we are asking for a skill we never taught. A mishandled encounter can deepen the very crisis it was meant to defuse and can end in a cell rather than in care.
There is, encouragingly, ground to build on. In several states, policing has moved toward a more community-oriented model that places officers in closer and less adversarial contact with the people they serve: Kerala's Janamaithri beat officers, Maharashtra's Mohalla Committees, Punjab's SAANJH centres. These are promising openings.
Also read: Anger at IIT Bombay After Dalit Student Dies by Suicide, Peers Accuse Institute of Casteism
But they remain limited in scope, confined to particular states and districts, varied in design, and, for the most part, not independently evaluated, so, surprisingly, we know little about what they achieve or how they would hold up at scale. There is no standardised national framework to build on, and a force stretched to roughly 150 officers per hundred thousand (lakh), well below the United Nations norm and often working long and irregular hours, cannot take on a demanding new role without deliberate support. A mental health response added to this landscape as a scattering of unmonitored pilots would tell us little and reach few.
If the police are to be deliberate partners in suicide prevention and crisis intervention rather than accidental ones, the capacity has to be built into institutions, not left to the initiative of individual officers or their experiential learning, and studied as it is built. Several things would need to move together.
A common skill set, taught at every rank. Psychological first aid, de-escalation, and the specific duties that the Mental Healthcare Act places on officers should sit within basic training, and not remain optional only drawing an interested few. Because policing is a state subject delivered in tiers, that means writing a common module into the curriculum at each level: the recruit schools where constables are trained, the colleges where sub-inspectors learn, and the state and national academies through which senior officers pass. Skill training only for commanding officers will never reach the constable who actually reaches the scene.
Embedded into what recruits already learn. This step does not disrupt, but rather just requires pulling the missing thread through modules that recruits already study. Basic training already includes first aid and emergency response, human rights and rights-based policing, ethics and empathy, community policing, and just like a road-accident victim benefitting not just from physical first aid but also psychological, makes it a natural extension rather than an addition. Integrating Mental Healthcare Act’s duties into the syllabus can contribute meaningfully to the community policing component, by recognising distress and linking person to care.
Some states already view constables as the public’s “first point of contact” and “first responder”, emphasising empathy and human dignity. The language of care is already woven into the curriculum, but the required action is to turn it into a concrete, measurable skill. In countries where officers have been trained in this way, there has been a reliable improvement in officers’ ability to recognise individuals at risk and respond confidently, as well as in their attitudes towards mental illness and suicide prevention.
Refreshers and standardisation, not one-off workshops
A single training event in a single district is not a policy, and its effects decay quickly. Serving officers, who set the working culture of a station, need periodic, competency-based refreshers, delivered through a train-the-trainer approach so that quality survives as the training cascades from master trainers to districts. Standardisation is ultimately a question of equity: whether a person in crisis is met with skill or with improvisation should not depend on which officer happens to arrive that night.
A continuum of care for every response
Recognition without referral helps no one. An officer's statutory duty should connect to a defined pathway, into the District Mental Health Programme, the nearest public health facility, and the free Tele-MANAS helpline (14416), or other psychosocial support providers through clear standard operating procedures rather than case-by-case guesswork. Where it is feasible, co-response arrangements that pair officers with mental health workers, tried in several countries and worth piloting carefully here, can steer people toward support services and can spare officers decisions they were never equipped to make alone.
Evaluation built in from the start
The thinness of evidence around existing community-policing efforts is itself the lesson. Any rollout should carry monitoring and independent evaluation with it, measuring not only how many officers are trained but whether encounters actually change, whether referrals reach care, and, over a longer horizon, whether outcomes improve. Building the evidence alongside the programme is what turns a promising idea into a defensible policy rather than one more scheme that no one can vouch for.
Support for the officers themselves
Policing carries a heavy and largely unspoken psychological burden, and an officer in untreated distress cannot steady anyone else. Confidential, accessible support for personnel is not a welfare add-on; it belongs to the same system that would ask them to care for others. It is also, quietly, a suicide prevention measure in its own right.
Much of this could be housed within commitments India has already made. The National Suicide Prevention Strategy of 2022 aims to cut suicide deaths by a tenth by 2030 and rests explicitly on different sectors working together. Naming law enforcement as an explicit, resourced partner within it, with the home ministry that already houses both the crime-records bureau and the police-research body playing an accountable part, would turn an assumed role into a planned one.
Small efforts can point the way and, done carefully, supply the early evidence. Through STRIDE an action research project by Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, our work with police in Bhubaneswar, we have been testing this kind of training in the local language, grounded in officers' own realities, and evaluating it as we go. It is one project in one city, and no substitute for a national commitment; it only suggests that the answer is buildable.
The uniform that arrives first at a crisis is already there. The real question is whether India will equip it to help, and take the trouble to learn whether that help works, before more lives are lost that a trained and supported response might have saved.
Nikhil Jain is a public and community mental health researcher specialising in systems thinking, suicide prevention, and health systems. He currently serves as Program Director and Research Fellow at the Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune.
If you know someone – friend or family member – at risk of suicide, please reach out to them. The Suicide Prevention India Foundation has a list of telephone numbers they can call to speak in confidence. Icall, a counselling service run by TISS, has maintained a crowdsourced list of therapists across the country. You could also take them to the nearest hospital.
This article went live on September twenty-eighth, two thousand twenty six, at forty-nine minutes past two in the afternoon.The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
