New Delhi: The Bombay high court on May 28 directed jail authorities in Maharashtra to shift 84-year-old incarcerated activist Stan Swamy from the Taloja prison to a private hospital in Mumbai for treatment for two weeks, after Swamy’s counsel said that the activist and his aides would bear the cost of his treatment.
Swamy was arrested in October, 2020, and charged under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act for allegedly harbouring connections with the banned CPI (Maoist). Swamy is facing charges along with 15 other human rights activists and has been in Taloja prison hospital since his arrest.
A bench of Justices S.S. Shinde and N.R. Borkar directed the prison authorities to ensure that Swamy was shifted from the prison in Navi Mumbai to the Holy Family Hospital in suburban Bandra “preferably during the course of the day.”
The bench’s order came after Swamy’s advocate, senior counsel Mihir Desai, moved the bench seeking an urgent hearing on a plea.
Advocate Desai had moved a vacation bench, led by Justice S.J. Kathawala, seeking medical aid and interim bail for Swamy.
At the time, the bench had said that while the issue of the medical bail would be decided later, Swamy could be shifted to the state-run JJ Hospital in Mumbai for treatment.
Swamy, who suffers from multiple ailments, was present before the court at the time via video-conferencing, but had refused to get admitted to the JJ Hospital, saying he had been there twice earlier but had found no relief.
He had said he would “rather die in prison than go to JJ Hospital” and would prefer to “be with his own.”
Swamy’s imprisonment, despite his ill health, had attracted widespread criticism. Recently, the Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha, a coalition of people’s organisations and activists in the state, urged the Maharashtra government to immediately ensure better treatment for him.
Cost of treatment
On Friday, Desai told the bench led by Justice Shinde that Swamy had agreed to get admitted to the Holy Family Hospital.
The NIA’s counsel, Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh, and the Maharashtra government counsel, Y.P. Yagnik, objected to Desai’s request.
They said the state could not be expected to bear the cost of Swamy’s treatment at the private hospital. They suggested that Swamy be shifted to the JJ Hospital instead.
The HC permitted Swamy to be shifted to the Holy Family Hospital after Desai said the cost of treatment would be borne by Swamy and his aides.
“We are of the view that the appellant can be given a choice of Holy Family Hospital for his treatment for 15 days. Appellant (Swamy) will bear the expenses,” the HC said.
“It is not in dispute that appellant’s age is 84 years and according to findings recorded by a team of doctors from JJ Hospital, he needs treatment. We request that the administration of Holy Family Hospital provide one attendant keeping in view age of the appellant,” the bench said.
The HC also permitted Swamy’s colleague, one Father Frazier, to meet him at the hospital at regular intervals as per hospital protocol.
On May 21, Swamy had told the HC that his mental and physical health had declined steadily while being lodged at the Taloja prison.
(With PTI inputs)