+
 
For the best experience, open
m.thewire.in
on your mobile browser or Download our App.

Central Hall | Justice for All, Not One Law for All: What the Constitution Says on Uniform Civil Code

Was the goal to secure justice for all, instead of uniformity? Three eminent legal minds discuss the matter with Kapil Sibal.
Support Free & Independent Journalism

Good evening, we need your help!!

Since May 2015, The Wire has been committed to the truth and presenting you with journalism that is fearless, truthful, and independent. Over the years there have been many attempts to throttle our reporting by way of lawsuits, FIRs and other strong arm tactics. It is your support that has kept independent journalism and free press alive in India.

If we raise funds from 2500 readers every month we will be able to pay salaries on time and keep our lights on. What you get is fearless journalism in your corner. It is that simple.

Contributions as little as ₹ 200 a month or ₹ 2500 a year keeps us going. Think of it as a subscription to the truth. We hope you stand with us and support us.

This episode of Central Hall deals with the Uniform Civil Code. What were the makers of the constitution thinking of when they included Article 44 in it? Why is it that wherever there are BJP governments, the UCC is part of conversations more than ever before?

Was the goal to secure justice for all, instead of uniformity? Three eminent legal minds discuss the matter with Kapil Sibal.

Legal scholar Faizan Mustafa is the Vice-Chancellor of Chanakya National Law University and the former V-C of the NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad. He was the founding V-C of the National Law University Odisha.

Chander Uday Singh is a Senior Advocate at the Supreme Court of India, who has argued in several important cases.

Meenakshi Arora is a Senior Advocate practising in the Supreme Court since 1985.

Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
facebook twitter