+
 
For the best experience, open
m.thewire.in
on your mobile browser or Download our App.

Here's What the Supreme Court Said on ED's Challenge to Hemant Soren's Bail

The top court dismissed the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) plea challenging the high court's judgment, terming it "very well-reasoned."
Jharkhand chief minister Hemant Soren. The Supreme Court is in the background.
Support Free & Independent Journalism

Good morning, we need your help!!

Since May 2015, The Wire has been committed to the truth and presenting you with journalism that is fearless, truthful, and independent. Over the years there have been many attempts to throttle our reporting by way of lawsuits, FIRs and other strong arm tactics. It is your support that has kept independent journalism and free press alive in India.

If we raise funds from 2500 readers every month we will be able to pay salaries on time and keep our lights on. What you get is fearless journalism in your corner. It is that simple.

Contributions as little as ₹ 200 a month or ₹ 2500 a year keeps us going. Think of it as a subscription to the truth. We hope you stand with us and support us.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday (July 29) has upheld the Jharkhand high court’s June 28 decision to grant bail to chief minister Hemant Soren in a money laundering case related to an alleged land scam. The top court dismissed the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) plea challenging the high court’s judgment, terming it “very well-reasoned.”

A bench comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and K.V. Viswanathan observed that the high court’s finding that Soren was not guilty of money laundering was based on valid reasons, Live Law reported.

The ED had objected to the high court’s disbelieving of witness statements recorded under Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

“In our opinion, it is a very well-reasoned order,” Justices Gavai said, as pert the report.

The Supreme Court noted that the high court had given valid reasons for disregarding the statements and that there was no direct evidence linking Soren to the possession of the land in question. The court also observed that Soren’s name did not appear in the numerous registers and revenue records recovered from the accused’s premises.

Also read: IAS Coaching Deaths: Education Minister Passes Buck to States in RS, BJP and AAP Trade Barbs

Justice Gavai was quoted as saying by Live Law, “Valid reasons have been given why they are disregarded.”

Further, as Additional Solicitor General S.V. Raju sought to argue further, Justice Gavai mentioned, “We don’t want to observe anything further. If we observe anything further, you will be in difficulty. Very well-reasoned judgment has been rendered by the ld. judge”

Justice Gavai disagreed with the ASG’s claim of corroborating documents, pointing out that a thorough examination of the records seized from Bhanu Pratap found no incriminating evidence against Soren.

The ED had alleged that Soren was involved in the acquisition, possession, and utilisation of proceeds of crime and had colluded with others, including Pratap to conceal original records. However, the Supreme Court was unmoved and dismissed the ED’s petition, clarifying that the high court’s observations would not influence the trial judge or any other proceedings.

The case relates to an alleged land scam in Ranchi, where Soren is accused of unauthorised possession and usage of approximately 8.5 acres of property. The ED is investigating both this case and an illegal mining case, and contends that the property constitutes proceeds of crime.

Notably, Soren was arrested by the ED on January 31 this year. He was release after Jharkhand high court on June 28 held him not guilty in the concerned case.

Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
facebook twitter