Add The Wire As Your Trusted Source
For the best experience, open
https://m.thewire.in
on your mobile browser.
AdvertisementAdvertisement

‘Is Organising Protest Site Enough To Attract UAPA?’: Delhi HC Asks Police

A bench of Justices Navin Chawla and Shalinder Kaur were hearing the bail pleas of the main accused in the 2020 Delhi riots case.
A bench of Justices Navin Chawla and Shalinder Kaur were hearing the bail pleas of the main accused in the 2020 Delhi riots case.
‘is organising protest site enough to attract uapa ’  delhi hc asks police
Justice Navin Chawla and Justice Shalinder Kaur. Illustation via Canva.
Advertisement

New Delhi: "Is setting up a protest site enough for [attracting charges under] the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA)?” a bench of the Delhi high court asked the Delhi police on Wednesday.

A bench of Justices Navin Chawla and Shalinder Kaur were hearing the bail pleas of the main accused in the 2020 Delhi riots case.

“The problem is only this. Is it your case that only setting up a protest site is enough for UAPA or those protest sites resulted in violence? But the most important thing is intent under UAPA which has to be established,” the bench said.

Special public prosecutor Amit Prasad took the bench through various WhatsApp chats during the hearing to establish that the riots were planned by the accused, LiveLaw reported.

When Prasad referred to a chat between two individuals who have not been accused in the case, the bench asked why they had not been charged if the prosecution is relying on their messages.

Advertisement

“How can you leave these two?... and you're relying on their messages. The conspiracy is that there are WhatsApp groups. In the WhatsApp groups, there are instigations that, let's do this, a planning which is of a chakka jam. There is also a hint of violence there, and violence actually happens. Till then, yes, if they are involved, you may say UAPA is attracted. But when you draw attention to something like a JACT (WhatsApp group) and your own argument is that they were organising protest sites. Is that good enough?” the bench asked Prasad.

The bench directed Prasad to make a table showing which accused person was a member of a particular WhatsApp group, LiveLaw reported.

Advertisement

“Why we've been asking you all this is that come to the specific…that this man, this is what I have against him, this is why I'm saying that he was actually instigating violence, rather than having a protest,” the bench said.

The matter will continue being heard on Thursday (January 9).

Advertisement

The bench is hearing the bail pleas filed by Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, Mohd. Saleem Khan, Shifa ur Rehman, Shadab Ahmed, Athar Khan, Khalid Saifi and Gulfisha Fatima. Delhi Police's appeal against bail granted to accused Ishrat Jahan is also listed in the batch, the report said.

Advertisement

This article went live on January ninth, two thousand twenty five, at forty-two minutes past eleven in the morning.

The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Series tlbr_img2 Columns tlbr_img3 Multimedia