+
 
For the best experience, open
m.thewire.in
on your mobile browser or Download our App.

Watch | 'New Criminal Laws Which Kick in July 1 Will Create Legal, Judicial Mess': Indira Jaising

The former Additional Solicitor General has appealed to the Union law minister to hold the three criminal laws in abeyance until they are further discussed and looked at closely once again.
Support Free & Independent Journalism

Good morning, we need your help!!

Since May 2015, The Wire has been committed to the truth and presenting you with journalism that is fearless, truthful, and independent. Over the years there have been many attempts to throttle our reporting by way of lawsuits, FIRs and other strong arm tactics. It is your support that has kept independent journalism and free press alive in India.

If we raise funds from 2500 readers every month we will be able to pay salaries on time and keep our lights on. What you get is fearless journalism in your corner. It is that simple.

Contributions as little as ₹ 200 a month or ₹ 2500 a year keeps us going. Think of it as a subscription to the truth. We hope you stand with us and support us.

One of India’s most highly regarded senior advocates Indira Jaising has said that if the three new criminal laws come into force on July 1, which is what the government intends, we will have “a legal and judicial mess” adding specifically that “life and liberty could be in danger”.

This is why the former Additional Solicitor General has appealed to the Union law minister as well as to all the leading opposition politicians in the country to hold the three criminal laws in abeyance until they are further discussed and looked at closely once again.

Jaising says that you could have two different justice systems running concurrently and in parallel, you could have endless disputes over which procedural law applies (old or new) and the pendency of cases could increase by 30% or even 40%.

The offences she discusses are Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, which she says is even more draconian than Section 124A of the IPC which defines sedition, second, the fact that many UAPA offences are repeated as offences under the new criminal law and, therefore, the “process” will be additionally “punishing” and, third, that the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita mandates a preliminary inquiry in every cognizable offence which is punishable for three years or more but less than seven and, therefore, FIRs won’t be automatically lodged.

Jaising says there will be multiple petitions challenging the new criminal laws in the Supreme Court as well as the major high courts in the country.

Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
facebook twitter