+
 
For the best experience, open
m.thewire.in
on your mobile browser or Download our App.

The Wire Talks | Adding Secular and Socialist to the Constitution in the Beginning Would Have Been Superfluous

'It was obvious from the document that it would be a welfare state and a secular state,' Raju Ramachandran says.
Sidharth Bhatia and Raju Ramachandran.
Support Free & Independent Journalism

Good morning, we need your help!

Since 2015, The Wire has fearlessly delivered independent journalism, holding truth to power.

Despite lawsuits and intimidation tactics, we persist with your support. Contribute as little as ₹ 200 a month and become a champion of free press in India.

The Indian constitution came into effect on January 26, 1950 and Republic Day is a commemoration of that. The framers of the constitution gave the nation a document that had the vision to guide matters of the Indian state.

Many questions have been raised about the constitution – some members of the BJP want to remove the words “secular” and “socialist” because they were not in the original document.

“It would have superfluous to add the words then,” says veteran constitutional lawyer Raju Ramchandran in this podcast discussion with Sidharth Bhatia. “It was obvious from the document that it would be a welfare state and a secular state” he says.

Ramachandran says the One Nation One Election idea “militates against federalism” because it “subordinates the rights against the states”. He rejects the idea that it would save money – “in fact it will be more expensive, with the cost of additional manpower, EVMs etc.”

Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
facebook twitter