+
 
For the best experience, open
m.thewire.in
on your mobile browser or Download our App.

States Can Levy Mines Tax Retrospectively from April 1, 2005: Supreme Court

Earlier, the majority of the bench had come to the conclusion that state governments had the power to levy tax under both Entry 49 and Entry 50 of the State List.
The Central Wing of the Supreme Court of India, where the Chief Justice's courtroom is situated. Photo: Subhashish Panigrahi/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Support Free & Independent Journalism

Good morning, we need your help!!

Since May 2015, The Wire has been committed to the truth and presenting you with journalism that is fearless, truthful, and independent. Over the years there have been many attempts to throttle our reporting by way of lawsuits, FIRs and other strong arm tactics. It is your support that has kept independent journalism and free press alive in India.

If we raise funds from 2500 readers every month we will be able to pay salaries on time and keep our lights on. What you get is fearless journalism in your corner. It is that simple.

Contributions as little as ₹ 200 a month or ₹ 2500 a year keeps us going. Think of it as a subscription to the truth. We hope you stand with us and support us.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday (August 14) declined pleas by the central government and assesses to let State Legislatures to tax mines and minerals rights only with prospective effect.

A nine judge bench of the Supreme Court had on July 25 upheld the state government’s power to tax mines and minerals.

The Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud on Wednesday (August 14) declared that States could levy tax on mines and mineral rights from April 1, 2005. Demands of tax would not operate for transactions prior to this court-off date, reported thehindubusinessline.com.

“We have rejected the submission that the judgment should not be applied retrospectively. But we have laid down certain conditionalities like there is no interest or penalty. The payment is staggered over 12 years and there would be no tax demands for transactions prior to April 1, 2005,” said Chief CJI Chandrachud.

Earlier, the majority of the bench had come to the conclusion that state governments had the power to levy tax under both Entry 49 and Entry 50 of the State List.

The majority said that parliament cannot not invoke “residuary powers” exercised under Entry 97 of the Union List to restrict a state’s taxing power.

Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
facebook twitter