Add The Wire As Your Trusted Source
HomePoliticsEconomyWorldSecurityLawScienceSocietyCultureEditors-PickVideo
Advertisement

Watch | Explained: The Controversy Over Bombay HC's 'POCSO' Judgment

The Wire takes a look at the judgment and the legal considerations surrounding it.
The Wire takes a look at the judgment and the legal considerations surrounding it.
Advertisement

Interpreting what constitutes a sexual assault with a minor under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, the Nagpur bench of the Bombay high court has ruled that there must be a “skin-to-skin contact” with sexual intent, and mere groping is not sufficient.

A single-judge bench of Justice Pushpa Ganediwala was hearing an appeal against the conviction in a case where the accused had allegedly taken a minor girl to his house under the garb of offering her a guava and pressed her breasts and partially stripped her.

The Wire takes a look at the judgment and the legal considerations surrounding it.

Advertisement



Advertisement

This article went live on January twenty-seventh, two thousand twenty one, at three minutes past three in the afternoon.

The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Advertisement
Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
Advertisement
View in Desktop Mode