Add The Wire As Your Trusted Source
For the best experience, open
https://m.thewire.in
on your mobile browser.
AdvertisementAdvertisement

Watch | Blocked, Sued, Silenced: Controlling Dissent in India

This video examines how Section 69A of the IT Act, defamation laws, and platform compliance rules together shape the current digital environment.
This video examines how Section 69A of the IT Act, defamation laws, and platform compliance rules together shape the current digital environment.
Advertisement

From the blocking of 4PM News on YouTube citing “national security” and “public order,” to the removal of an animated satirical video by The Wire, the use of legal and administrative powers to restrict content is becoming more visible.

The video also covers the case of a Dalit YouTuber facing a Rs 50-crore defamation lawsuit and FIR after summarising a published report, highlighting how legal pressure can impact individual creators.

At the platform level, companies like X, Facebook, and YouTube are required to comply with government takedown orders under the IT Rules, 2021. Several accounts — including @DrNimoYadav, @Nehr_who, @indian_armada, @mrjethwani_, @Doc_RGM, and journalist Sandeep Singh — have been withheld in India following such legal demands.

This video examines how Section 69A of the IT Act, defamation laws, and platform compliance rules together shape the current digital environment.

Advertisement
This article went live on April first, two thousand twenty six, at five minutes past seven in the evening.

The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Series tlbr_img2 Columns tlbr_img3 Multimedia