Add The Wire As Your Trusted Source
HomePoliticsEconomyWorldSecurityLawScienceSocietyCultureEditors-PickVideo
Advertisement

'Aadhaar Shouldn't Be Replicated in Other Countries': 200 Citizens, 50 Organisations Write

'At every step, the Aadhaar project has been a law unto itself. It began without any legal backing.'
The Wire Staff
an hour ago
  • whatsapp
  • fb
  • twitter
'At every step, the Aadhaar project has been a law unto itself. It began without any legal backing.'
Representative image of an Aadhaar card. Photo: File
Advertisement

New Delhi: Nearly 200 eminent citizens and 54 rights organisations have reiterated their warning on Aadhaar, urging caution to countries who wish to repeat this model.

The statement, which is released on the eve of Human Rights Day, December 10, asks the international community not to fall for India's biometric identity model or the propaganda around it.

The signatories say they were compelled to release the statement after the ID4D Initiative of the World Bank began projecting Aadhaar as a success for countries like Kenya, Nigeria and Uganda to emulate. UK prime minister Keir Starmer, meanwhile, called Aadhaar a "massive success" in his recent visit to India, reigniting a debate on a national ID in the UK.

Advertisement

The signatories highlight the Aadhaar in the last 15 years, especially the social exclusion it has brought forth.

The full text of their letter is below.

Advertisement

Beware of Aadhaar: A Warning on India’s Biometric Identity Model 

We, concerned Indian citizens and organisations, are alarmed to note that efforts are being made to promote biometric identity systems similar to Aadhaar in other countries. 

Aadhaar is India’s unique identity number, linked with a person’s biometrics (fingerprints, iris and photograph as of now). The number was rolled out with fanfare from 2009 onwards. The use of this number, and of Aadhaar-based biometric authentication (ABBA), was promoted to the hilt by the Indian government in close collaboration with the IT industry. Aadhaar was supposed to be voluntary, but it quickly became clear that living without it would be very difficult for most. Today, it is as good as compulsory. Most social benefits are out of reach without Aadhaar. 

Aadhaar was rolled out in an explicitly “evangelistic” mode from day one. In recent years, it has been projected as a grand success by its promoters. Their friends in high places (like Davos, the World Bank, and the B&M Gates Foundation) are on board. There is an attempt, partly successful already, to project Aadhaar as a model and “export” it to other countries. 

For our part, we view Aadhaar as a failed and objectionable model that should not be replicated in other countries, certainly not in its Indian version. 

Our main concerns are as follows: 

  1. Aadhaar involves the creation a centralized database that includes biometrics as well as demographic information (e.g. name, gender, date of birth and address). This could turn into a dangerous tool of social control, especially but not only in the hands of an authoritarian government. 
  2. The linkage of numerous databases with Aadhaar magnifies the danger of it becoming a tool for profiling, surveillance, exclusion and worse. Centralized databases also pose data security risks by creating a single point of failure. 
  3. While the “core biometrics” (biometrics minus photograph) in the Aadhaar database are supposed to be secure, the rest is freely shared with authorised users of Aadhaar authentication, with minimal safeguards. This is a major infringement of privacy. 
  4. The demographic details attached to Aadhaar numbers in the database are full of errors, partly due to hasty rollout. Yet severe restrictions have been placed on correcting this information. Meanwhile, people are expected to align other documents with this unreliable information. This is causing endless hassles to poor people. Many of them are excluded from some or all social benefits. 
  5. Biometric failures are another major source of social exclusion, especially for the elderly. Aadhaar was rolled out without any transparency about the reliability of biometric authentication.
  6. A significant minority of people, mainly from marginalised groups (including disabled persons), do not have Aadhaar for some reason and no fault of their own. They are excluded from most social benefits. 
  7. If an Aadhaar number is lost, it can be very difficult to retrieve. Poor people have been forced to make long and expensive trips to regional assistance centres for this purpose. Some never managed to retrieve it, and are now deprived of all social benefits. 
  8. The coercive “seeding” of Aadhaar with endless databases (ration cards, job cards, pension lists, bank accounts, voter lists, what not), associated with function creep, is a monumental waste of time for functionaries and citizens. Seeding sounds simple but it requires biometric or demographic verification. Both can be very cumbersome. 
  9. The rush for correction or update of Aadhaar details has led to humongous queues at many assistance centres, where people often wait in line for hours with no guarantee of remedy. There are no facilities for tracking of grievance redressal, continuity of  assistance, or other relief. People’s time and money are wasted to no end. 
  10. Far from rooting out corruption, Aadhaar’s centralised database has enhanced information asymmetries and reduced transparency. Integration of Aadhaar with the banking system has magnified exposure to new vulnerabilities such as identity fraud. 
  11. At every step, the Aadhaar project has been a law unto itself. It began without any legal backing. Later, the Aadhaar Act was passed by bypassing the Upper House of Parliament. The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) often violates orders of the Supreme Court of India (e.g., protections for children and against use by private entities). It has enormous power and regularly issues rules that make life difficult for millions, without any serious feedback from affected people. A critical provision for  parliamentary oversight of UIDAI was dropped in the final version of the Aadhaar Act.

Articles and reports amplifying these concerns are available at rethinkaadhaar.in 

The promoters of Aadhaar were never able to justify this particular identity model or to explain what ills it is supposed to remedy. Instead, they relied on propaganda to push for it. Many countries have functional identity systems that are less coercive, invasive, exclusionary and unreliable than Aadhaar.  

We urge the greatest caution from countries that are considering a replication of the Aadhaar model. We would be happy to facilitate field visits for anyone interested in understanding these problems in more detail. 

Signatory Organisations

  1. All India Democratic Women’s Association (AIDWA)
  2. All India Lawyers Association for Justice (AILAJ) 
  3. All India Progressive Women’s Association (AIPWA) 
  4. All India Students’ Association (AISA) 
  5. Ambedkarijame Punadi (Andhra Pradesh) 
  6. Bahutva Karnataka 
  7. Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD) 
  8. Dalit Bahujan Front 
  9. Democratic Students’ Federation (DSF) 
  10. Gig and Platform Services Workers Union 
  11. Grakoos Union 
  12. Hamal Panchayat (trade union) 
  13. Human Rights Law Network (HRLN) 
  14. Internet Freedom Foundation 
  15. Jan Jagran Shakti Sangathan (JJSS) 
  16. Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) 
  17. Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha (JJM) 
  18. JNU Students Union 
  19. Karwan e Mohabbat 
  20. Khudai Khidmatgar India 
  21. LibTech India 
  22. Maadhyam (a civic engagement initiative) 
  23. Maharashtra Shramik Ustod & Vahtuk Kamgar Sanghatana (trade union)
  24. Manjeera Dalitha Seva Samithi (Telangana) 
  25. Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS) 
  26. Moneylife Foundation 
  27. National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) 
  28. National Alliance for Justice, Accountability and Rights (NAJAR)
  29. National Campaign Committee for Central Legislation on Construction Workers
  30. National Campaign Committee for Unorganised Sector Workers (NCCUSW)
  31. National Campaign Committee on Eradication of Bonded Labour (NCCEBL)
  32. National Campaign for People’s Right to Information (NCPRI) 
  33. National Confederation of Dalit Organisations (NACDOR) 
  34. National Federation of Indian Women (NFIW) 
  35. National Platform for the Rights of the Disabled (NPRD) 
  36. New Trade Union Initiative (NTUI) 
  37. NREGA Sansharsh Morcha 
  38. NREGA Watch (Jharkhand) 
  39. Paschim Banga Khet Majoor Samity (PBKMS) 
  40. Pension Parishad 
  41. People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) 
  42. People’s Union for Democratic Rights (PUDR) 
  43. RANG Foundation 
  44. Rethink Aadhaar 
  45. Right to Food Campaign 
  46. Safai Karmachari Andolan (SKA)
  47. Safdar Hashmi Memorial Trust (SAHMAT)
  48. Samalochana Association (Andhra Pradesh) 
  49. Sangatin Kisan Mazdoor Sangathan (SKMS) 
  50. Satark Nagrik Sangathan 
  51. Social Accountability Forum for Action and Research (SAFAR)
  52. SR Sankaran Adivasi Sahaya Kendram (Andhra Pradesh)
  53. United Forum for RTI Campaign (Andhra Pradesh) 
  54. United Milli Forum (Jharkhand) 

Individual Signatories

  1. Aakar Patel, Writer
  2. Aban Raza, concerned citizen 
  3. Abha Bhaiya, India coordinator, One Billion Rising campaign 
  4. Aditi Mishra, Jawaharlal Nehru University 
  5. Adv Albertina, National Alliance of People’s Movements 
  6. Advocate Dr Shalu Nigam, Lawyer and researcher 
  7. Advocate Vertika Mani, Org. Secretary, People's Union for Civil Liberties 8. Akhila Phadnis, concerned citizen 
  8. Akshay S Dinesh, Action for Equity 
  9. Alok Laddha, Chennai Mathematical Institute 
  10. Alphonse Raj, concerned citizen 
  11. Amber Sinha, Tech Policy Press 
  12. Ambika Tandon, University of Cambridge 
  13. Anand Mazgaonkar, concerned citizen 
  14. Anand Patwardhan, Filmmaker 
  15. Anand Teltumbde, Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights, Mumbai 17. Anantha, concerned citizen 
  16. Anivar A Aravind, concerned citizen 
  17. Ankita Aggarwal, concerned citizen 
  18. Annie Raja, concerned citizen 
  19. Anjor, Dialogues on Democracy and Development 
  20. Anupam Pachauri, Indira Gandhi National Open University 
  21. Anuradha Talwar, Paschim Banga Khet Majoor Samity 
  22. Anurag Mehra, Retired IIT Faculty 
  23. Arun Khote, National Movement for Land, Labour & Justice
  24. Arun Kumar, Retired Professor, Jawaharlal Nehru University
  25. Aruna Rodrigues, concerned citizen 
  26. Aruna Roy, School for Democracy 
  27. Arundhati Dhuru, NAPM Convenor 
  28. Arundhati Roy, Writer 
  29. Ashish Ranjan, National Alliance of People’s Movements 
  30. Ashlesh Biradar, Brave New Web 
  31. Ashok Bharti, National Confederation of Dalit Organisations
  32. Ashokan Nambiar, C MAHE, Manipal, Karnataka 
  33. Avantika Tewari, Jawaharlal Nehru University 
  34. Baghamabar Pattnaik, Anti-slavery India 
  35. Bela Bhatia, Lawyer and writer 
  36. Bezwada Wilson, National Convenor, Safai Karmchari Andolan
  37. Bhanuj Kappal, Independent journalist 
  38. Bhanwar Meghwanshi, People’s Union for Civil Liberties 
  39. Bhargav Oza, National Alliance for Justice, Accountability, and Rights
  40. Bhoomika Pandhare, concerned citizen
  41. Bhupen Singh, University of Sussex 
  42. Bittu K R, Women against Sexual Violence and State Repression
  43. 45. Brinda Crishna, concerned citizen 
  44. Budhaditya Bhattacharya, concerned citizen 
  45. Chirashree Das Gupta, Jawaharlal Nehru University 
  46. Clifton D'Rosario, advocate 
  47. Colin Gonsalves, advocate 
  48. Danish Ali, concerned citizen 
  49. Dayamani Barla, concerned citizen 
  50. Deep Chandra Joshi, concerned citizen 
  51. Devi, All India Democratic Women’s Association 
  52. Dorothy Vallado, concerned citizen 
  53. Dr Indu Prakash Singh, Facilitator, CityMakers Mission International
  54. Dr Sudhir Vombatkere, concerned citizen 
  55. Dr Sylvia Karpagam, Public health doctor 
  56. Dwiji Guru, National Alliance of People’s Movements 
  57. Edwin, OpenSpace 
  58. Firoz Ahmad, school teacher 
  59. Francis Bosco, National Federation of Unorganised and Migrant Workers
  60. Gangaram Paikra, concerned citizen 
  61. Gautam Bhatia, Constitutional law scholar and Professor of Law
  62. Gouranga Mohapatra, Jana Swasthya Abhiyan Odisha 
  63. Gowramma, Akila Bharath Janavadi Mahila Sangatane (Karnataka)
  64. H M Sunasara, concerned citizen 
  65. Harish Dhawan, concerned citizen 
  66. Harsh Mander, Karwan e Mohabbat 
  67. Hemant Sareen, concerned citizen  
  68. Himmat Singh Ratnoo, Former Secretary MDU Teachers' Association (MDUTA) Rohtak
  69. Hindolee Datta, concerned citizen 
  70. Indira C, Public health researcher 
  71. Indira Unninayar, Advocate, Supreme Court and Delhi High Court
  72. Jagdish Patel, concerned citizen 
  73. Jayati Ghosh, Economist 
  74. James Herenj, NREGA Watch Jharkhand 
  75. Jean Drèze, Development economist 
  76. John Dayal, Writer 
  77. John Simte, Lawyer 
  78. Justice A.P. Shah, Retired Judge and former Chairman of the Law Commission of India
  79. JT D’souza, concerned citizen 
  80. K.A. Verghese, Green Kerala 
  81. Karen Gabriel, St Stephen's College, Delhi 
  82. Karuna M, NREGA Sangharsh Morcha 
  83. Kalyani Menon Sen, Independent researcher 
  84. Kelvin, concerned citizen 
  85. Kiran Jonnalagadda, concerned citizen 
  86. Koninika Ray, National Federation of Indian Women 
  87. Krishnakant Chauhan, Activist 
  88. Laavanya Tamang, Independent researcher 
  89. Lawrence Liang, Legal academic 
  90. Laxmi Murthy, Journalist and researcher 
  91. Lubna Sarwath, Advocate 
  92. M S Sriram, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore 
  93. M. Balakrishnan, concerned citizen
  94. Maimoona Mollah, Women's rights activist
  95. Martin Macwan, concerned citizen 
  96. Matthe Mautarelli, concerned citizen 
  97. Meera Sanghamitra, National Alliance of People’s Movements
  98. 100. Meghna Jayanth, concerned citizen 
  99. Meghna Yadav, Researcher 
  100. Mritiunjoy Mohanty, Indian Institute of Management Calcutta (retd)
  101. Mukul Kesavan, Retired teacher 
  102. Nandini Sundar, University of Delhi 
  103. Nandita Narain, Associate Professor (Retd), St. Stephen's College, Delhi University
  104. Nandita Sengupta, Journalist, Times of India 
  105. Navsharan Singh, Researcher activist 
  106. Nayanjyoti, Lecturer in Development Studies, Delhi 
  107. NB Murthy, concerned citizen 
  108. Neeraj Hatekar, Researcher 
  109. Nikhil Dey, Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan 
  110. Nishant S, Researcher 
  111. Nishi, concerned citizen 
  112. Nitish Kumar, Former JNUSU President 
  113. Nivedita Menon, Jawaharlal Nehru University 
  114. Om Damani, concerned citizen 
  115. P. Sainath, journalist 
  116. Padmini Ramesh, Johns Hopkins University 
  117. Paran Amitava, PhD Scholar, Jawaharlal Nehru University 
  118. Parth Sharma, Nivarana 
  119. Parthasarathi Paul, concerned citizen 
  120. Persis Ginwalla, concerned citizen 
  121. Praavita, Rethink Aadhaar 
  122. Pradeep E, concerned citizen 
  123. Pradyumna Behera, Independent researcher 
  124. Prafulla Samantara, President, Lok Shakti Abhiyan 
  125. Prakash Louis, Bihar migrant hub 
  126. Prasad Chacko, Social worker, Ahmedabad 
  127. Prasanna S, Advocate, Supreme Court of India 
  128. Praveer Peter, National Alliance of People’s Movements 
  129. Prof Ritu Dewan, Director (Retd), Mumbai School of Economics & Public Policy
  130. Prof. Mohan Rao, concerned citizen 
  131. Purbayan C, Advocate 
  132. Pushpendra, Former Professor, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai
  133. Rahul Basu, concerned citizen 
  134. Raj Shekhar, Right to Food Campaign 
  135. Rajaraman, Independent journalist and researcher 
  136. Rajesh Ramakrishnan, concerned citizen 
  137. Rajinder Chaudhary, Former Professor of Economics, MD University, Rohtak
  138. Rama Teltumbde, concerned citizen 
  139. Raman Jit Singh Chima, Lawyer 
  140. Ramdas Rao, Member, People’s Union for Civil Liberties 
  141. Rammanohar Reddy, Editor 
  142. Reetika Khera, Development economist 
  143. Renuka Kad, concerned citizen 
  144. Ritash, RANG Foundation 
  145. Rohini Hensman, Writer and independent scholar 
  146. Rohith Jyothish, concerned citizen
  147. Rosamma Thomas, concerned citizen
  148. S.Q. Masood, ASEEM 
  149. Sakina Dhorajiwala, LibTech India 
  150. Sameet Panda, Right to Food Campaign 
  151. Sandeep Khurana, Retired professional 
  152. Sandeep Mertia, Stevens Institute of Technology 
  153. Sarah M, concerned citizen 
  154. Seema Mahi, concerned citizen 
  155. Shabnam Hashmi, Independent social activist 
  156. Shahjahan, concerned citizen 
  157. Shahvir Aga, concerned citizen 
  158. Shailja Tandon, concerned citizen 
  159. Shailly Gupta, concerned citizen 
  160. Shantha Sinha, Independent advocate of children's rights
  161. Sharanya, Indigenous People’s Land, Life and Knowledge Collective
  162. Shishu Ranjan, All India Forum for Right to Education
  163. Shiva Shankar, Retired academic 
  164. Shreekant Gupta, Professor (retired), University of Delhi
  165. Shruti Narayan, Lawyer 
  166. Siddharth de Souza, concerned citizen 
  167. Siddhartha Das, Public health activist 
  168. Snehan Kekre, Technologist 
  169. Sookthi K, concerned citizen 
  170. Srikanth, CashlessConsumer 
  171. Srinivas Kodali, Independent researcher 
  172. Srujana Bej, Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University
  173. Stella James, Independent legal consultant 
  174. Sucheta Dalal, Founder Trustee, Moneylife Foundation
  175. Sudhir Gandotra, concerned citizen 
  176. Sunil Kaul, Right to Food and Information 
  177. Suresh Chandra Joshi, concerned citizen 
  178. Suruchi, concerned citizen 
  179. Swathi, Eddelu, Karnataka 
  180. Swati Desai, concerned citizen 
  181. Swati Narayan, National Law School of India University, Bengaluru
  182. Syed Asif Ali Zaidi, Lawyer 
  183. T M Krishna, Musician and author 
  184. T. Ramakrishnan, concerned citizen 
  185. Tarangini Sriraman, King's College, London 
  186. Timir Basu, Frontier Weekly 
  187. Trilochan S, concerned citizen 
  188. Uma Chakravarti, historian 
  189. Usha Ramanathan, Independent law researcher 
  190. V Rukmini Rao, Feminist activist 
  191. V Upadhyay, Retired professor 
  192. Vasavi Kiro, concerned citizen 
  193. Vasundhar, concerned citizen 
  194. Veena Shatrugna, Independent researcher 
  195. Vickram Crishna, Independent researcher 
  196. Vimala k.s., concerned citizen 
  197. Vipul Paikra, Independent researcher 
  198. Vivek K, concerned citizen
  199. Winona D'Souza, Lawyer, Mumbai
This article went live on December ninth, two thousand twenty five, at thirty-four minutes past five in the evening.

The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Advertisement
Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
Advertisement
View in Desktop Mode