Why the Gen Z Movement Is More Than a Moment – It Directly Challenges the Status Quo

Let us not dismiss the Gen Z movement as a mere display of discontent or as a list of demands for jobs, public services or a better quality of life. Feel the deeper stirring that resulted from complete alienation a whole generation from the institutions, political habits and social structures that shape our public life. This generation is entirely unwilling to accept what previous generations accepted as inevitable.

Asking which political party would gain or lose would be myopic. We must not miss this historical opportunity by treating this expression of anger and discontent as a show of impatience, entitlement or rebellion.

The seniors in the society will commit their biggest folly if they patronise the young brigade. They must share their experiences but strictly avoid giving any advice. It is best for the young to know what to anticipate and let them find their solutions, which, so far have been very unconventional for the elders.

Perhaps we are witnessing an Indian Renaissance to reconstruct ourselves around the promises of justice, liberty, equality, dignity, respect and accountability made in the constitution.

That this dissatisfaction cannot be boxed within conventional politics and cuts through the entrenched caste system makes it extremely significant. It tells us the frustration is not with one government. It is with the socio-political culture that regards power as an end and tolerates hate, inequality and discrimination as tools.

The young Indians live in a globally connected society that opens windows for them to see how institutions maintain their independence, public money is accounted for, universities produce knowledge, transparency is forced on institutions and how cities are administered. They also see how governments are held to questions.

The contradiction of the reality of hierarchical, opaque and unaccountable institutions at home is untenable for them.

The bigger crisis

An easy but intellectually dishonest way would be to blame today's political establishment.

Our institutional deterioration is not by one party, ideology or generation, nor did it happen overnight. Through decades, we collectively tolerated compromises...we excused corruption saying “everyone does it”, accepted poor public services saying “nothing will change” and  rationalised political patronage as inevitable. We ignored educational decline, institutional opacity and the gradual drift of public morality away from private morality. As individuals, we never lit the torch for ourselves.

Also read: What the World's Gen Z Uprisings Tell Us About India's Own

We let societal baselines erode by leading a life of contradiction, demanding integrity from institutions while making compromises to corruption in our own lives. As individuals, we never took responsibility to maintain the ethical standards. Outrageous practices are a routine for us. We let the unacceptable become unfortunate and then lived with it as normal.

Democracies do not decay through a dramatic collapse. They decay through every compromised individual. The most progressive constitution in the world cannot protect the republic unless its institutions personify its principles and citizens insist that the institutions remain that way.

Justice is the judiciary’s measure

Nothing is more critical to a constitutional democracy than the judiciary. It is the last resort and first saviour. The democratic foundation of equality is nonexistent when justice fails to be timely, impartial and accessible.

We may be the only country where the elders advise against going to the court even when we have been wronged. The Indian judiciary suffers enormous pendency, procedural complexity, unequal access and a culture of power that is forbidding to the ordinary citizen.

The judiciary’s institutional accountability is questionable. There is growing opacity around how judges are selected, their merit assessed, their elevations decided and their conflicts of interest addressed. There is no guidance on how justice can be obtained within months rather than generations by a common Indian.

It is not clear what efforts are made by the judiciary to remain genuinely independent while ensuring that independence cannot mean immunity from scrutiny.

India needs an independent but accountable judiciary whose legitimacy comes not just from constitutional authority or institutional prestige but from the quality, integrity and timeliness of the justice it delivers.

Not institutional entitlement but judicial integrity and dutifulness must be judiciary's ultimate measure.

Quality education must be free, accessible and enabling

From being the second-most-important portfolio in independent India's first Cabinet, education has become a pedestrian affair. No country can sustainably outperform the quality of its schools, universities and teachers. Oblivious to this, India has created islands of excellence in a vast expense of poor-quality, commercialised education which suffer from political interference and credentialism.

Schools must create citizens capable of reasoning, assessing, questioning with scientific temper. It must create citizens who can differentiate between knowledge and propaganda. When the rich and influential abandon public education, they withdraw their pressure on the institutions to improve. Society then separates into those who can purchase opportunity and the rest who must satisfy with the crumbs.

Also read: The Gen Z & Gen Alpha Mandate: India’s Youth Uprising Outruns Traditional Statecraft

Any meaningful equality dies then. We need to recreate the educational system with professional autonomy, high academic standards, highest research integrity. A system that dignifies teachers and prevents political patronage and predatory commercialisation.

Make politicians replaceable

We need to create a political system that has indispensable institutions but dispensable politicians. The system cannot become hostage to individuals. It may mean we need to reconsider India's electoral architecture including the first-past-the-post system to help us move away from legislative dominance coming from mere plurality and not from real majority.

We need to ask whether the current electoral system and the needs of our transforming society are in tandem.

We must insist that all political parties must have fully transparent democratic processes. The political system should make corruption difficult, misconduct detectable and the political cost of failure of responsibility prohibitive.

Restore the federal balance

While the GST framework was an ambitious attempt to create a national armature, it has seriously eroded the federal structure of our country. Financial independence is the foundation of any meaningful self-determination. This holds as much for institutions as for individuals.

The GST framework has made the states excessively dependent on the whims of the union government. Responsibility should be supported by financial authority is a simple democratic principle the GST has mauled.

India can be strong only with strong, accountable and financially capable states. We need to restore the strength of the federation.

Transparency must be the default

The most transformative reform is conceptually the simplest. Everything involving public money should be subject only to legitimate privacy and national security protections, which must be publicly traceable.

Imagine that when we click on a road on the map, we are able to know its construction contractor, see the tender documents, sanctioned costs, the supervisors’ details, completion details, specifications, maintenance obligation, payments made and inspection reports, including the name of the inspector.

Imagine this for every government contract and procurement. Imagine this for political party financing; for every piece of individual's information that the government keeps, subject to legitimate privacy protections. Imagine this for the research and doctoral work and for all the public officials.

Technology has made it easy to be completely transparent, yet we continue with systems of paper files, closed offices, opaque access and information scarcity.

Also read: Gen Z is Not a Movement

The democratic principle for the digital ages is simple: secrecy must require justification, transparency should not. Transparency will redistribute power to the citizens.

Paying it forward to the republic

Every generation receives a country it did not design. The question is whether it chooses to improve it. Gen Z inherited extraordinary possibilities and contradictions. They have shown the courage and appetite to expand the possibilities and marginalise the contradictions.

We must not be afraid of their anger. We should be frightened if they were indifferent. Still, the real test lies ahead. If this dissatisfaction mature into a sustained program of democratic reconstruction, Gen Z will have paved the way to pay it forward to their country.

It requires young Indians to become lawyers, teachers, researchers, entrepreneurs, journalists, administrators, engineers and political leaders who refuse to make the compromises they condemn. It requires building institutions and not just attacking existing ones.

It requires transforming in civic culture as well. Such as programme should transcend political parties. It should demand electoral reform without undermining democracy, judicial accountability without destroying judicial independence; educational renewal without ideological capture; federalism without national fragmentation, and transparency without abandoning legitimate privacy.

Above all, it must insist that the no Indian should need wealth, connections, caste, influence or political patronage to receive the dignity that citizenship already promises. That would be the true measure of reform.

The opportunity before India's younger generation is therefore greater than changing a government. It must change the relationship between Indians themselves. Political parties will come and go. Leaders will rise and fall. Governments will win and lose elections. The larger ambition must survive all of them.

If this generation can convert its dissatisfaction into institutions that are transparent, decentralised, meritocratic and accountable, history may remember this period not merely as another season of political unrest, but as the moment when Indians rediscovered the visionary promise of their own Republic.

Everyone must be singularly focused on reclaiming our democracy and nothing else. This must be a start of an entrenched fight against an idea of an unequal society; against an apparatus that justifies oppression; against a mindset that refuses to create future from the present; against an ideology that argues in favour of non-transparency; against the outlook that fails to put the weakest at the center every single time.

The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.