+
 
For the best experience, open
m.thewire.in
on your mobile browser or Download our App.

From Investigation to Petition: How the SC Ruling on Caste Discrimination in Prisons Came to Be

The court was hearing the public interest litigation filed by The Wire’s Sukanya Shantha
Support Free & Independent Journalism

Good morning, we need your help!!

Since May 2015, The Wire has been committed to the truth and presenting you with journalism that is fearless, truthful, and independent. Over the years there have been many attempts to throttle our reporting by way of lawsuits, FIRs and other strong arm tactics. It is your support that has kept independent journalism and free press alive in India.

If we raise funds from 2500 readers every month we will be able to pay salaries on time and keep our lights on. What you get is fearless journalism in your corner. It is that simple.

Contributions as little as ₹ 200 a month or ₹ 2500 a year keeps us going. Think of it as a subscription to the truth. We hope you stand with us and support us.

On October 3, a Supreme Court bench of Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud and Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra said that provisions in prison manuals across states that discriminate on the basis of caste are unconstitutional. The court dealt with provisions around labour in prisons, barrack segregation and the targeting of denotified tribes through the vague and arbitrary use of the term ‘habitual offenders’, and said that states must rework their manuals within three months in compliance with the court order.

The court was hearing the public interest litigation filed by The Wire’s Sukanya Shantha, following her investigative work on the state-sanctioned caste-based discrimination and segregation in Indian prisons. In conversation with Jahnavi Sen, Shantha talks about her investigation, the petition that came out of it and salient features of the Supreme Court judgment.

Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
facebook twitter