Modifications which do not pose safety hazards should be permissible; third-party accessory or fitments should not be banned in totality but examined on a case-case basis to see whether the alteration made is a safety hazard.

The Code of Criminal Procedure and Supreme Court judgments make it clear that a magistrate may remand an accused to custody only if the police are able to show why an arrest is necessary.

Since "cruelty" is legally defined, here are some examples of judicial pronouncements which have discussed the concept of granting divorce to aggrieved spouses.

There are already enough checks and balances in place in the form of guidelines framed by the Union and considered by the CBFC.

Recent verdicts by the Punjab and Haryana high court on granting protections to couples in live-in relationships shows why courts should be guided by constitutional morality, not what is socially acceptable.

In the recent case the Election Commission brought against the Madras high court, the Supreme Court has once again upheld that media is well within its right to report on what transpires in the courts when it serves the public interest.

Section 201 of the IPC, carrying seven years' imprisonment, deals with knowledge of a crime and intent to shield a criminal.

When the media either frontally or suggestively pronounces on the merits of a matter that is sub judice or builds public opinion on guilt or innocence in criminal trials, it enters the province of courts.