Do we need more evidence to convince ourselves that these people are itching to dance on the grave of Gandhian tolerance?

This cloud of suspicion on EVMs has hovered over the electoral horizon for far too long to be ignored.

Pre-poll conversations with ordinary people unambiguously recorded widespread displeasure; the anti-BJP sentiment was overwhelming.

What would he do when a period of conflict and distress is hawked as Amrit Kaal?   

It is manifestly clear that Modi has factored in the distinct possibility of Congress's return to power and that could be one reason for his lacklustre performance at rallies.

Ganesha had to be invoked before the Maharashtra election where the BJP is in a hopeless situation.

Rejecting the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh-Bharatiya Janata Party's idea of uniformity, the Congress leader unambiguously said that India was a union of cultures and under no circumstances could hate and anger be accepted as values.

Modi’s boastful claims on development, reforms and corruption also suggested he has presumed intellect is dead in this great country. He speaks as if the audience is bound to listen in unquestioning obedience, without using their brains.

'Har Ghar Tiranga' looks like a noble project at the superficial level but there is more to patriotism than such hollow symbolism.      

The abnormally high degree of tolerance of evil Indian society usually demonstrates must be acknowledged and reviewed at this juncture of national heartbreak.

Rahul Gandhi has understood the Congress folly of not realising the criticality of social justice earlier and constructed a new politics, using caste census as a potential instrument of social transformation.

Modi hasn’t yet shown any capacity for change. He thrives in his rigidities. This is paving the way for Rahul Gandhi.

Rahul Gandhi, with a photograph of the Hindu deity Shiva in his hand, was addressing people who are convinced that the Congress is anti-Hindu. He had to activate a dormant truth to trample down the masquerading lie.

Despite Rajya Sabha chairman Jagdeep Dhankar's partisan role and desperate attempts to silence criticism against Modi and his party, the Congress leader stood his ground to once again shine light on BJP's hate politics.

Gujarat Congress chief and Rajya Sabha member Shaktisinh Gohil called for an investigation into how the National Testing Agency (NTA) granted two centers to Jay Jalaram International School, an institution with a history of fraudulent activities, questioning the agency's decision-making process.

Gujarat Congress chief and Rajya Sabha member Shaktisinh Gohil called for an investigation into how the National Testing Agency (NTA) granted two centers to Jay Jalaram International School, an institution with a history of fraudulent activities, questioning the agency's decision-making process.

While the Presidential address, though prepared by the government, is usually devoid of political criticism, Modi’s frustration over the Opposition’s outcry on threats to democracy found manifestation in her speech.

Modi frittered away an opportunity to acknowledge that the 18th Lok Sabha is commencing at a critical juncture, where the nation is grappling with frustration and dismay among its youth.

Those who imagined that “Brand Modi” will change because it is weakened need to understand what this brand is all about. Modi was christened “Hindu Hriday Samrat” in 2002 itself, when he had no pretensions of development or governance.

The brand Narendra Modi lies dismantled. Voters danced on the debris of his arrogance, manifested so crudely through the 'char-sau-paar' boast, advertising the absurdity of his political posturing.