Saurav Das explores the recent surge of bail orders issued by the Supreme Court, particularly for high-profile opposition leaders like Manish Sisodia and K. Kavitha.

In the last 10 years, allegations of institutional capture by Prime Minister Modi’s government have been one of the major accusations.

We look at Salim Malik’s story that echoes countless others trapped in a labyrinth of injustice, including Umar Khalid. Each day spent in confinement erodes hope and corrodes faith in a fair judicial process.

The apathy shown by India’s criminal justice system can be best understood through accused Salim Malik's case.

The Wire has a new multimedia show called ‘The Justice Brief, With Saurav Das,’ which will transcend headlines and dive deep into the heart of legal matters.

A request for a CBI probe against Lalit Modi has been pending a decision since October 2017 with one of the decision-making Union government departments directly under Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

A request for a CBI probe against Lalit Modi has been pending a decision since October 2017 with one of the decision-making Union government departments directly under Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

A request for a CBI probe against Lalit Modi has been pending a decision since October 2017 with one of the decision-making Union government departments directly under Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

A request for a CBI probe against Lalit Modi has been pending a decision since October 2017 with one of the decision-making Union government departments directly under Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

The committee whose recommendations ultimately culminated in the present form of the Bills has operated in complete secrecy ever since its constitution in May 2020. Sources told The Wire that two non-members – the SG and ASG – exerted influence on the committee.

MEITY blocks information requests citing national security and the requirement to maintain “strict confidentiality”. A Delhi high court case may help change practices around internet censorship in India.

Since the IT rules were made in 2009, the review committee has not passed a single order revoking a content takedown order. Experts say this means that the review system is "systematically broken".

As it happens, there is no overarching framework of rules to prevent news channels from airing untruths and indulging in sensationalism even over sensitive subjects.